The Walt Right
Walt Right Perspectives
Episode 21 : Philosophical banter with Bentham's Bulldog
4
0:00
-2:00:40

Episode 21 : Philosophical banter with Bentham's Bulldog

4

In this episode of Walt Right Perspectives I speak with Bentham’s Bulldog, a philosophy student who is a stalwart advocate of Act Utilitarianism and mostly subscribes to Matt Yglesias-style center-left politics.

We get into some technical and autistic debate over moral intuitions, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind / free will, but as a former Philosophy major I found this to be a tremendously stimulating discussion and think lots of you will agree!

Topics include:

  • The appeal of utilitarianism and Effective Altruism to Bentham’s Bulldog

  • Act vs. Rule Libertarianism

  • Can utilitarianism be used to justify everything?

  • Popular suspicion toward Effective Altruism in the wake of SBF’s grifting

  • Existential risks and tenability of longtermism given unpredictability of future

  • Popular disdain for rationalist formalism

  • BB’s article Shooting the Messenger about how certain topics (like Walt’s article about women going through puberty too early) carry a certain inherent stink and close off productive conversation

  • Tenability of Peter Singer’s idea that people shouldn’t go on vacation and have a moral obligation to donate much of their income to charity

  • The value of proximity and ingroup preference as moral factors—should you value saving poor Americans over starving Africans?

  • The role of intuition in moral reasoning—things that “seem obvious”

  • Charity as altruistic impulse vs. an opportunity for signaling and accruing status

  • The Is / Ought Distinction and BB’s moral realism vs. Walt’s notion of morality as “intersubjective consensus”

  • Are the fundamental laws of logic / mathematical axioms true objectively or because we assume they are true?

  • Are physical categories like “mountain” objective or intersubjectively defined?

  • Walt’s philosophical skepticism driven by the inherent limitations of human intellectual and sensory faculties

  • BB’s moderate stance on Israel and the Gaza War

  • Extremism and closemindedness of anti-Israel protestors at BB’s college

  • Are anti-Zionist protestors anti-Semitic? Are they dangerous / intimidating?

  • What does a Two State Solution look like? How can any such solution deal with the right of return?

  • Probability that Bibi will ethnically cleanse Gaza if Trump wins

  • Is the Gaza War substantively different from past conflicts or is there just more space for dissent because of demographic change among Zoomers?

  • Is Israel going to install a puppet state?

  • BB’s Jewish heritage and its personal importance to him

  • BB’s veganism and Walt’s vegan past as a teenager—have things improved on factory farms over the past fifteen years?

  • Do we have more of an obligation to domestic animals like dogs / cats vs. livestock animals such as pigs and cows?

  • The pertinence of proximity as a moral factor as applied to factory farms vs. torturing chickens in your backyard

  • Under Utilitarianism does a person have a greater moral responsibility to one’s own children vs. other children?

  • Is there a practical way to implement Utilitarianism?

  • BB’s recent adoption of a generic theism due to the Fine Tuning Argument

  • Why BB thinks theism is more tenable than deism

  • BB’s response to the Problem of Evil

  • BB’s view that Christianity does not support the existence of an eternal Hell

  • BB’s rejection of compatibilism on Free Will and support of dualism

  • Does a dualist understanding of the mind / the Hard Problem of Consciousness undermine the scientific rigor of psychiatry?

  • The greater normativity of psychiatry than other branches of medicine / science

  • The state of modern academia (peer review, journal system, replication crisis)

  • Rigor of continental philosophy vs. analytic philosophy and the value of artistic / poetic philosophy of thinkers like Nietzsche and Voltaire

  • BB’s extreme disdain for existentialism / absurdism and hatred for Camus

  • Walt’s defense of continental philosophy as a form of art

  • How Walt became more of a normie as he aged and acquired an appreciation for epistemic relativism and a more artistic form of rhetoric

  • How autism makes rationalists very bad at looking at the subtext of various issues

  • Was BB’s article “Losing Faith in Contrarianism” itself a contrarian take?

  • How a high verbal IQ and friendly disposition make it much harder to be canceled

A historical scene depicting Jeremy Bentham, an 18th-century philosopher, sitting in a classic, ornate armchair in a library setting. He has a stern, thoughtful expression, wearing a black suit with a white shirt and a cravat. Next to him, a large, intimidating Bulldog with a stocky build, wearing round glasses, sits looking serious. The room is filled with books and a dim, warm light illuminates the setting, creating a thoughtful atmosphere.
4 Comments
The Walt Right
Walt Right Perspectives
Building intellectual rigor and human capital on the right, one hot take at a time.
If you have interesting ideas I'll give you a platform.